The 5 EYES

The Five Eyes, often abbreviated asFVEY, grew out of a UK-US agreement after World War II, a partnership which later expanded to include Canada, Australia and New Zealand, it entailed the mutual sharing of signals and communications intelligence between these countries — with the understanding, they would not spy on each other.

The terms of the arrangement had not always been upheld, and relations had occasionally been fraught, with Washington previously threatening others with expulsion or suspension from the group.

ENC3_131375327180030000

 

The members have since extended co-operation to include exchanging personnel and strategic assessments.

Like an omnivorous, 24-hour news organisation, the Five Eyes’ operations and facilities cover all time zones and continents, from listening stations at Naval Station Norfolk, to naval ships off Iran and satellite ground stations in the UK countryside, on top of the partnership’s hub, the National Security Agency, near Washington.

The Five Eyes has given America’s deep state a phenomenal reach and an unmatched level of integration with its allies that the West’s geopolitical rivals, notably China and Russia, cannot replicate.

Nsa-Treasure-Map

It also provides an intelligence windfall for its smaller members, like Australia.

For decades, the intelligence partnership was never acknowledged by respective governments, let alone talked about in public.

Duncan Campbell, a longtime investigative reporter in the UK, thinks the first time the Five Eyes name was mentioned in public was barely a decade ago, in the pages of The Sydney Morning Herald.

During the course of the Cold War, the ECHELON surveillance system was initially developed by the FVEY to monitor the communications of the former Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, although it is now used to monitor billions of private communications worldwide.

 

In the late 1990s, the existence of ECHELON was disclosed to the public, triggering a major debate in the European Parliament and, to a lesser extent, the United States Congress.

As part of efforts in the ongoing War on Terror since 2001, the FVEY further expanded their surveillance capabilities, with much emphasis placed on monitoring the World Wide Web.

Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed that the FVEY have been spying on one another’s citizens and sharing  collected information with each other, in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on surveillance of citizens.

In spite of continued controversy over its methods, the Five Eyes relationship remains one of the most comprehensive known espionage alliances in history.

unnamed.jpg

The origins of the Five Eyes alliance can be traced back to the Atlantic Charter, which was issued in August 1941 to lay out the Allied goals for the post-war world.

On 17 May 1943, the British–U.S. Communication Intelligence Agreement, also known as the BRUSA Agreement, was signed by the UK and U.S. governments to facilitate co-operation between the U.S. War Department and the British Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS).

On 5 March 1946, the secret treaty was formalized as the UKUSA Agreement, which forms the basis for all signal intelligence cooperation between the NSA and the GCHQ to this day.

gchq1

In 1948, the treaty was extended to include Canada, followed by Norway (1952), Denmark (1954), West Germany (1955), Australia (1956), and New Zealand (1956).These countries participated in the alliance as “third parties“.

By 1955, the formal status of the remaining Five Eyes countries was officially acknowledged in a newer version of the UKUSA Agreement that contained the following statement:

At this time only Canada, Australia and New Zealand will be regarded as UKUSA-collaborating Commonwealth countries.

The “Five Eyes” term has its origins as a shorthand for a “AUS/CAN/NZ/UK/US EYES ONLY” (AUSCANNZUKUS) classification level.

Cold War (1950s–1990s)
During the Cold War, the GCHQ and the NSA shared intelligence on the Soviet Union, the People’s Republic of China, and several eastern European countries

exciting-it-careers-at-gchq.jpg

Over the course of several decades, the ECHELON surveillance network was developed to monitor the military and diplomatic communications of the Soviet Union and its Eastern Bloc allies.

During the Vietnam War, Australian and New Zealand operators in the Asia-Pacific region worked directly to support the United States, while GCHQ operators stationed in the (then) British colony of Hong Kong were tasked with monitoring North Vietnamese air defence networks.

During the Falklands War, the British received intelligence data from its FVEY allies such as Australia, as well as from third parties such as Norway and France.

nsa (1).jpg

ECHELON network disclosures (1988–2000)
By the end of the 20th century, the ECHELON surveillance network had evolved into a global system capable of sweeping up massive amounts of private and commercial communications, including telephone calls, fax, e-mail and other data traffic.


RAF Menwith Hill, North Yorkshire, England

500px-Menwith-hill-radomes

This was done through the interception of communication bearers such as satellite transmission and public switched telephone networks.

The Five Eyes has two types of information collection methods: the PRISM program and the Upstream collection system.

The PRISM program gathers user information from technology firms such as Google, Apple and Microsoft, while the Upstream system gathers information directly from the communications of civilians via fiber cables and infrastructure as data flows past.

f6befe86f8ba6efac19d7be1459a73d1.jpg
Supposed upstream

 

In 1988, Duncan Campbell revealed in the New Statesman the existence of ECHELON, an extension of the UKUSA Agreement on global signals intelligence [Sigint].

slide.jpg

The story, ‘Somebody’s listening,’ detailed how the eavesdropping operations were not only being employed in the interests of ‘national security,’ but were regularly abused for corporate espionage in the service of US business interests. The piece passed largely unnoticed outside of journalism circles.

In 1996, a detailed description of ECHELON was provided by New Zealand journalist Nicky Hager in a book titled “Secret PowerNew Zealand’s Role in the International Spy Network“, which was cited by the European Parliament in a 1998 report titled “An Appraisal of the Technology of Political Control” (PE 168.184).

On 16 March 2000, the Parliament called for a resolution on the Five Eyes and their ECHELON surveillance network, which, if passed, would have called for the “complete dismantling of ECHELON”.

Three months later, the Temporary Committee on ECHELON was set up by the European Parliament to investigate the ECHELON surveillance network.

However, according to a number of European politicians such as Esko Seppänen of Finland, these investigations were hindered by the European Commission.

In the United States, congressional legislators warned that the ECHELON system could be used to monitor U.S. citizens. On 14 May 2001, the U.S. government cancelled all meetings with the Temporary Committee on ECHELON.

defense-large.jpg

 

 

War on Terror (2001–present)

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the surveillance capabilities of the Five Eyes were greatly increased as part of the global War on Terror.

During the run-up to the Iraq War, the communications of UN weapons inspector Hans Blix were monitored by the Five Eyes.

An NSA memo detailed plans of the Five Eyes to boost eavesdropping on UN delegations of 6 countries as part of a “dirty tricks” campaign to apply pressure on these six countries to vote in favor of using force against Iraq.

In 2013, documents leaked by the former NSA contractor Snowden revealed the existence of numerous surveillance programs jointly operated by the Five Eyes.

The following list includes several notable examples reported in the media:

  1. PRISM – Operated by the NSA together with the GCHQ and the ASD
  2. XKeyscore – Operated by the NSA with contributions from the ASD and the GCSB
  3. Tempora – Operated by the GCHQ with contributions from the NSA
  4. MUSCULAR – Operated by the GCHQ and the NSA
  5. STATEROOM – Operated by the ASD, CIA, CSE, GCHQ, and NSA

In March 2014, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordered Australia to stop spying on East Timor.

  • This marks the first time that such restrictions are imposed on a member of the FVEY.

Domestic espionage sharing controversy
The Five Eyes alliance is sort of an artifact of the post World War II era where the … countries are the major powers banded together to sort of co-operate and share the costs of intelligence gathering infrastructure. … The result of this was over decades and decades some sort of a supra-national intelligence organisation that doesn’t answer to the laws of its own countries.
Edward Snowden

In recent years, documents of the FVEY have shown that they are intentionally spying on one another’s citizens and sharing the collected information with each other in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on spying

Shami Chakrabarti, the director of the advocacy group Liberty, claimed that the FVEY alliance increases the ability of member states to “subcontract their dirty work” to each other.

STASI_-_FIVE_EYES_ggmigl

The former NSA contractor Edward Snowden described the FVEY as a “supra-national intelligence organisation that doesn’t answer to the laws of its own countries”.

As a result of Snowden’s disclosures, the FVEY alliance has become the subject of a growing amount of controversy in parts of the world:

Canada: In late 2013, Canadian federal judge Richard Mosley strongly rebuked the CSIS for outsourcing its surveillance of Canadians to overseas partner agencies.

A 51-page court ruling asserts that the CSIS and other Canadian federal agencies have been illegally enlisting FVEY allies in global surveillance dragnets, while keeping domestic federal courts in the dark.
New Zealand: In 2014, the NZSIS and the GCSB of New Zealand were asked by the New Zealand Parliament to clarify if they had received any monetary contributions from members of the FVEY alliance.

Both agencies withheld relevant information and refused to disclose any possible monetary contributions from the FVEY.

David Cunliffe, leader of the Labour Party, asserted that the public is entitled to be informed.

European Union:

In early 2014, the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs released a draft report which confirmed that the intelligence agencies of New Zealand and Canada have cooperated with the NSA under the Five Eyes program  and may have been actively sharing the personal data of EU citizens.

Other International Cooperatives

Since the addition of two members in 1956, the specific Five Eyes consist of Australia (accepted 1956), Canada (accepted 1948), New Zealand (accepted 1956), the United Kingdom (co-creator 1946), and the United States (co-creator 1946).

Further, there is a group of nations termed ‘3rd Party Partners’, which share their intelligence with the 5 Eyes.

While the Five Eyes is a very specific agreement with specific operations among the five nations, other non-FVEY sharing agreements have been set up independently and for specific purposes.

For example, according to Edward Snowden, the NSA has a “massive body” called the Foreign Affairs Directorate that is responsible for partnering with foreign countries.

nsa.jpg

Six Eyes

According to the news magazine L’Obs, in 2009, the United States proposed to France to join the Five Eyes, that would then have become the “Six Eyes“.

Nicolas Sarkozy however made the requirement to be granted the same status as other allies, including the signing of a “no-spy agreement“.

This requirement was approved by the director of the NSA, but not by the director of the CIA, and furthermore not by President Barack Obama, resulting in a refusal from France.

In 2013 it was reported that Germany was interested in joining the Five Eyes alliance.

At that time, several members of the United States Congress, including Tim Ryan and Charles Dent, were pushing for Germany’s entrance to the Five Eyes alliance.

Israel is, reportedly, an observer in Five Eyes.

Singapore is reported to have partnered with the Five Eyes.

Nine Eyes

A map of the Nine Eyes countries

The Nine Eyes is a different arrangement that consists of the same members of Five Eyes working with DenmarkFrance, the Netherlands and Norway.

A fictionalized Nine Eyes, with a different list of member states (including South Africa and China), was a key plot device in the 2015 film Spectre.

However obviously, there are real world  spying organizations in other parts of the world such as Asia and Africa, along with Latin America.

45760887_283976908990515_2444233342500098315_n.jpg

Fourteen Eyes

 

According to a document leaked by Edward Snowden, there is another working agreement among 14 nations officially known as SIGINT Seniors Europe, or “SSEUR“.

These “14 Eyes” consist of the same members of 9 Eyes plus GermanyBelgiumItalySpain and Sweden.

Further intelligence sharing collaborations

 

As spelled out by Privacy International, there are a number of issue-specific intelligence agreements that include some or all the above nations and numerous others, such as:

 

  • An area specific sharing among the 41 nations that formed the allied coalition in Afghanistan;
  • A shared effort of the Five Eyes nations in “focused cooperation” on computer network exploitation with Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey;
  • Club of Berne: 17 members including primarily European States; the US is not a member;
  • The Counterterrorist Group: a wider membership than the 17 European States that make up the Club of Berne, and includes the US;
  • NATO Special Committee: made up of the heads of the security services of NATO’s 28 member countries

2DE8C64D00000578-3294993-image-a-4_1446123917466.jpg

More recently Jan 2019, Japan is strengthening its relationship with the so-called Five Eyes, as China expands its military might and information-gathering operations in the Asia-Pacific region.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will meet with British counterpart Theresa May. The leaders are expected to agree to advance cooperation on Japan’sFree and Open Indo-Pacific” strategy, a counterweight to China’s presence in the region. Britain is an originator of the alliance between Englishspeaking nations.

Canada also requested for Abe and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to discuss China’s arrest of Canadian citizens, as Five Eyes members seek Japan’s cooperation.

After Canadian authorities seized a top Chinese executive from the telecommunications giant Huawei at Vancouver Airport in late 2018, on a US arrest warrant, Beijing immediately set about retaliating.

 

3b8c90e2-cdee-11e8-9460-2e07e264bd11_1280x720_155002.jpg

A couple of Canadians who, until then, had been working openly in China, were detained.

Top-level meetings for Canadian diplomats dried up. And Beijing made clear more was to come, threatening “grave consequences” unless the Huawei executive was released.

Amid this furore, one prominent Chinese media outlet suggested another target to turn the screws on Ottawa.

“In this complicated game,” said the Global Times, the Chinese might be looking at multiple avenues for hitting back after the Huawei detention is hardly surprising.

The arrest, after all, came in the middle of a high-stakes geopolitical fight involving Huawei, with the US, Australia and New Zealand pushing the global Chinese company out of next-generation mobile networks, for fear Beijing would use them for spying.

The Global Times doesn’t speak for Beijing, but it has an outsized voice in China nonetheless, courtesy of its owner, the People’s Daily, itself the official mouthpiece of the Communist Party.

The fact that the warrant had been issued by a grand jury in the US for bank fraud, and reviewed independently by a Canadian judge, carried little weight with Beijing, which sees US law as little more than a political weapon.

The focus on the “Five Eyes” by the Global Times and other Chinese commentators, however, is acutely revealing, not least because it displays how Beijing sees itself hemmed by the West, particularly the old Anglosphere.

Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defense, Cabinet Satellite Intelligence Center and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency were also invited to participate in the U.S. Air Force Space Command’s Schriever Wargame for the first time in October.

Japanese agencies participated in simulations of how their satellite systems could aid the U.S. if American space communications were attacked.

 

Security_Hill_at_Misawa_Air_Base_with_AN-FLR-9_(1990s)
Misawa Air Base Security Operations Center (MSOC), Aomori Prefecture, Japan

Japan will also deepen cooperation with Five Eyes members to prevent cargo smuggling by North Korean ships on the sea.

Aircraft from the US., Australia, Canada and New Zealand have been tasked with the bulk of surveillance, although British naval vessels also patrol the South China Sea.

Japan has shared pictures of North Korean smuggling with each nation.

Coordination between Japan and the intelligence-sharing allies in the digital and telecommunications fields has also gained attention.

The Five Eyes members accused Chinabased hacker group APT10, which the U.S. believes is linked to Beijing’s Ministry of State Security, in December 2018, of trying to steal intellectual property.

A Japan Foreign Ministry spokesperson issued a rebuke of the hackers soon after.

“The Self-Defense Force is highly interested in the information on the Chinese military that the Five Eyes have gathered in the Sea of Japan and South China Sea,” said a Japanese government official.

The U.S., Europe and Japan also share a sense of concern about China’s rapid growth in the field of data.

Japan’s new defense guidelines approved Dec. 18 2018 put a focus on space, cybersecurity and electromagnetic wave technologies — the same fields prioritized by the Five Eyes.

Translate »